#365_1E: Hidden invasion of evil UFOnauts and requirements of strategy for defending the institution of marriage (part 1)
Summary: Dear reader. In this item #V1 of the post #365E to blogs of totalizm and also in item #V1 of the web page "humanity.htm" from which this post was adapted I discuss marriages as one among a number of the most important life obligations strictly defined for people by God, and I also remind the revolutionary commandments of Jesus regarding marriages, which, together with other commandments of God, ultimately allow for the complete elimination of the existence of evil from our "world of matter" before God will be able to give immortal bodies to people who meet Jesus' requirements (as described in verses 13:41-43 from "Matthew" in the Bible - note that I standardly quote verses from the Polish Catholic "Millennium Bible", available on-line e.g. at the address: http://biblia-online.pl/Biblia/ListaKsiag/Tysiaclecia ). I also explain the benefits of these revolutionary commands of Jesus using the example of the effects of changing relations in marriages between men and women - which are the only marriages recognized by God. We achieve this change in relations through the strategy of removing the unilaterally forced "taking" temporary of bodily "pleasure" cleverly pre-programmed into many marriages by the "powers of evil" secretly operating on Earth, which "taking" has dominated marriages until today, and replacing this "taking" with mutual and voluntary "giving". As logic and practice prove, adopting voluntary and mutual "giving" as the strategy for the operation of a given marriage, allows this egoistic and momentary "pleasure" of the body, which characterizes the quality of the one-sided effects of "taking", to be transformed into a lasting spiritual sense of mutual "happiness and fulfilment" - that is, to be transformed into wonderful qualities that the inhabitants of our civilization increasingly lack. I will end explanations from this item #V1 with an example of a sterile baobab flower shown on Fig. #V1a below to discuss and remind the role of "inspiration" as a foundation for learning and for proper use of the reality that surrounds us, and as a way for God to examine us from the level of our morality.
#V1. The permanent elimination of evil from our world of matter due to implementing the revolutionary principles of life taught by Jesus and the philosophy of Christianity that command us to act exactly opposite to the motivations or desires of human bodies and the emotions resulting from the needs of these bodies, and including, among other things, the voluntarily "giving" instead of selfishly forced "taking" from others (e.g. see the Bible, verses 20:35 from the Acts of the Apostles or 6:38 from Luke):
Motto: "Whatever you do in your life, always try to do it in a way that is contrary to the dictates of your body and the dictates of emotions originating from the body, and it will change your life to be incomparably happier and more fulfilled." (For example, instead of "lying", always try to speak, write, seek and promote "truths" - even if these are disapproved by many and if some people avoid learning them - see the Bible, e.g. verses: 20:16 from the Book of Exodus, 19: 11 from the Book of Leviticus, 15:2 from the Book of Psalms, 12:19 from the Book of Proverbs, 13:8 from 2 Corinthians. Instead of selfish "taking", always try to voluntarily "give" - see the Bible, e.g. verses: 20:35 from Acts of the Apostles and 6:38 from Luke. Instead of vengeful "eye for eye and tooth for tooth" always try to "forgive" or "turn the other cheek" - see the Bible, e.g. verses 5:38-41 from "Matthew". Instead fulfilling of only some of God's commandments (e.g. only "Thou shalt not kill"), fulfil all 10 commandments voluntarily and out of love for God, neighbours and nature in equally pedantic manner - see the Bible, e.g. verse 11:23 from Luke, interpreted in more detail in item #K5 from web page named "petone.htm" and in post #364E to blogs of totalizm. Instead of doing everything along the "line of the least moral effort", always try to do it along the "line of the highest moral effort" - as I explained it e.g. in #C1 and #A2.1 from the web page named "totalizm.htm")
The above revolutionary principles of life taught by Jesus and the philosophy of Christianity ended the pre-Jesus period of exclusively parasitic interpersonal coexistence, characterized by the custom (that still is legalized by human laws) of "taking" from others by force, bribery or deceit, everything they had useful and that to someone with power or wealth appeared to be desirable although he or she either did NOT want to earn out this useful thing, or accomplishing it is NOT within his/her capabilities (e.g. see web page "parasitism.htm"). After that period of exclusively parasitic coexistence, there came a "transitional period" that still lasts today, in which humanity tries to implement the revolutionary principles of coexistence taught by Jesus and described in the Bible. Unfortunately, humanity still does NOT succeed in overcoming the resistance of the anti-God and parasitic "powers of evil" that I described in my blogs #364E to #359E. To this day, there are many reasons why humanity has been implementing these principles of Jesus almost unsuccessfully for so long and with such miserable results. The most important of these reasons I have already described in detail in these posts to blogs of totalizm numbered from #364E to #359E, and in the publications from which these posts were adapted (the reader can read these posts e.g. from "volume N" of my Polish publication [13] free disseminated by the web page "tekst_13.htm", or from the addresses provided e.g. in item #Z2 of the web page "humanity.htm"). One of the most significant of these reasons is the forcing of humanity into its current situation, when, using the superior technique of telepathic and post-hypnotic commands, these "powers of evil" manage to obtain the approval of an increasing number of people who accept their reprogramming to insist on selfish satisfaction of their needs by "taking" forced on others or even on the husband or wife, while fewer and fewer people still try to voluntarily "give" in the way recommended by Jesus and described in the Bible. Therefore, in this item #V1 of the post #365E I will explain why voluntary "giving" out of love for God, neighbours and nature is an incomparably more beneficial way of acting both for each individual person and for the entire humanity, than forced "taking" in any manner that suits us.
Voluntary "giving" is one of the actions ordered to us by Jesus and described in the Bible, which ultimately serves to eliminate all evil from our "world of matter" before God decides to give immortality to people chosen by Him (see Bible, 13:41-43 from " Matthew"). Some of these actions I have detailed in the "motto" to this item #V1. The implementation of all these actions by any civilization is an absolutely necessary condition for this civilization to be able to last and flourish for an infinite period of time, without blowing itself up - just as, among the ancestors of humanity, blew themselves up the inhabitants of the planets Nerra and Whistheen described in paragraphs numbers {5500} and {5450} from subsection #B3 of our free treatise [3b] entitled in Polish "Kosmiczna układanka" (which title means the "Cosmic puzzle") free disseminated via the web page "tekst_3b.htm". (And it is worth remembering here that having nuclear weapons, humanity is already very close to the possibility of blowing itself up, e.g. due to madness or excessive inflation of his own "ego" or ambition by one of its rulers.) As an explanation of "why" NOT following these Jesus rules of conduct always leads to complete collapse, death and destruction, let us consider the vengeful principle of "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" which is still practiced by most individual people as well as leaders of states and even entire governments, instead of practicing the "forgiveness" or even "turning the other cheek" required by God - see https://www.google.com/search?q=Bible+forgiving+instead+of+eye+for+eye . After all, if the vindictive and parasitic principle of "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" is practiced, then the mutual removal of these symbolic "eyes" or "teeth" never ends. If we look around, we notice that human nature is such that whenever someone deprives someone else of something, then some excuses are always found to take it back from the depriver or to take something at least equivalent. As a result, we see how NOT only individual people, but also entire families, gangs, and even entire nations or countries, have a deep resentment towards someone and a desire for revenge, because something was taken away from them in the past. And it should be noted that during the period of implementation of this vindictive principle of "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" there is practically NO such person, family, gang, nation or country from which someone would not at some point of time take something away by force, deception, or unjust bribery. Hence, in some cases, this desire for revenge has lasted for centuries, and sometimes even thousands of years, while in the current culture of people's parasitic beliefs, it can only be ended by the almost complete murder of the participants of one of the parties taking revenge on each other. (It is also worth remembering here that in the event of continuation of revenge and hostile confrontations between two parties, each of these parties has a 50% chance of being completely murdered. Therefore, the more consistent with God's intentions, more logical and eliminating evil because it leads to mutual survival, is to accept what even today seems to be too-drastically revolutionary, namely to accept the recommendation of Jesus from the Bible "to forgive" - instead of, for example, taking "an eye for an eye".)
All of the rules of conduct described in the above "motto" work similarly. For example, in the case of forced "taking" from others instead of voluntary "giving", this taking will require more and more force and ruthlessness of coercion, because the party from whom something is taken will be developing and growing more and more reasons and ways of resisting this taking. After all, "taking" is a kind of coercion, and hence also a kind of "evil" - while every evil has this feature that "evil begets evil" (which fact is explained in the Bible by Matthew 7:17-19, Luke 6:43-45 and James 3:11-12 on the example of fruit, while by my research in #D1 from web page "wtc_pl.htm"). To illustrate this with a simplified example, let's consider how the situation may develop if both participants in a modern marriage act on the principle of forced "taking". Then, for example, the wife of the so-called "good husband" (i.e. a husband with characteristics consistent with the Chinese proverb stating "bad husbands always have good wives, while good husbands always have bad wives" - see blog #364E) will quickly realize that because of the "marital monopoly" which is given to her by current human laws (see item #J2.2.2 from my web page named "morals.htm" or from post #203E to the blogs of totalizm), she may refuse to perform her marital duties and thus "take" from her husband the increasingly greater submission and service. This "taking" in turn gradually suppresses the "manly" version of the human trait desired by everyone (especially by women - see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=masculine+containment+male+providing+woman+with ) in English called "masculine containment" (which into Polish translates as "męskie powstrzymywanie zła" meaning "manly containment of evil") because it boils down to "actions of males keeping something harmful under control or within limits". What exactly this "masculine containment of evil" is, best expresses symbolically the English proverb: my home is my castle - see https://www.google.com/search?q=my+home+my+castle . This means, for example, deterring burglars or rapists, repairing everything that is broken, work requiring muscles and strength, teaching children order by strictly demanding that everything taken is returned to its original and proper place, keeping children disciplined, etc. In turn, when by this "taking" she completely subjugates her husband, then typically such a wife will lose all respect for her husband, considering him to be a "wimp" and a "henpecked" who does NOT have this desired "masculine containment". Even women themselves are aware of the existence of these devastating consequences of the "subtractive" nature of women, typically striving to lose respect for their husbands - as revealed by the 1-minute English-language video "What ALL women want" with the address https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k1tt6hKFyA . In turn, this wife's self-induced loss of respect for her husband may tempt her to find someone else who will be more "masculine" in her eyes. And when she gets bored with the other one, or he gets rid of her, then she can look for someone else - after all, as the Polish saying goes, "there are always amateurs for free plums", while almost nothing is so addictive as gaining sexual pleasures through frequent changes of partners. As a result, the number of her past partners will increase (which has a highly devastating effect on her psyche, on her reputation and on the health of her body), while her life with her husband simultaneously begins to be characterized by the phenomenon of marital habituation - see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=marital+habituation . This, in turn, over time leads her to the development of full-blown female "narcissism" - see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=female+narcissism , which is to result in the phenomena described in item #V2 from the web page "humanity.htm", most of time leading to the breakdown of the marriage, the loss of its achievements, and probably also to loneliness full of bitterness and regret.
It is worth adding here that in old times a female version of the same feature was also known - which could be called "feminine containment". But unfortunately, it has got almost completely extinct to this day. This feature caused that husbands were eager to return home to their wives after work, because they knew that there was NOT an avalanche of grumbling, complaining and reproach waiting for them in home, but love, sincerity, care, moral support, etc., awaited them in there - i.e. awaited this everything that once made women the best mothers and nurses just by birth, and which was very well expressed by an old English saying, about which I remember from my youth that it also had a Polish version but currently this Polish version is NOT available on the Internet anymore, informing that men make houses women make homes (see https://www.google.pl/search?q=men+make+houses+women+make+homes - in Polish: "mężowie wznoszą budynki ale żony przemieniają je w domy" - meaning "husbands erect buildings but wives turn them into homes").
So let's define what Jesus described as "giving" and what distinguishes this voluntary "giving" from momentary "taking". My analyzes of what the Bible tries to convey to us under the name "giving" in those verses associated with this name through the "cause and effect chains", after translated into today's language and expressed in a modern and more descriptive and understandable way, allow the biblical definition of "giving" to be expressed e.g. as follows. "Giving is an action resulting from love for God, neighbours, or nature, and depending on the voluntary and intentional overcoming by giver of any resistance caused by needs, habits, or the action of the givers' body (e.g. by the so-called laziness), in order to enrich the chosen recipients of this giving with both bodily and spiritual experiences that will arouse or increase in them the faith in God and in good intentions among people." In other words, giving only includes actions and situations when what we give requires our voluntary, personal and self-initiated contribution to at least emotional (and often also physical) overcoming some significant resistance that exists within us, and, moreover, it often also requires a contribution of: effort, learning, skills, listening, understanding, knowledge, active action, courage, etc. So "giving" understood in this way is NOT, for example, the case when someone rich (e.g. a millionaire) gives a tip to a waiter or a banknote to a beggar. The reason is that when one has a lot of money, giving someone a banknote does NOT require overcoming any significant resistance or putting in e.g. effort. However, giving would be, for example, if this millionaire gave the same amount to someone in noble need, whose views were different from his own and whom he would first have to personally find somewhere on the other side of the world (because this situation requires overcoming of the internal reluctance towards a person with opposing views, as well as the will to work and to put effort into personally finding the recipient, thus together these would make it "giving" in Jesus' definition). Also the "giving" is, for example, when a wife voluntarily and personally is cooking his favourite dish (or even the entire dinner) for her husband when he returns tired from work, even if the cooking wife is also tired. (Overcoming it through fatigue and personal execution, as well as the knowledge that must be put into making the dish that is her husband's favourite, tasty, and that it DOES NOT contain the health-damaging and life-shortening chemicals now ubiquitous in cans, bottles and flashy packaging of factory-processed food, is what her action would make "giving" in line with the ideas of Jesus.) It should also be mentioned here that marriages that operate on the principle of "giving" should not respond with the word NO. This is because the answer NO also originates from forcing, i.e. from "taking", means from evil - and as I have already emphasized above, the Bible tries to teach us that "evil begets evil". So if factual and objective research were carried out, then it would probably turn out that many, if not most, divorces result from answering too often with the word NO. Therefore, especially in marriage, and in general also in other life situations, one must learn to use other (e.g. conditional) expressions that are no longer a definitive evil, e.g.: "tomorrow is better, because it will be the beginning of our holidays", or "YES, but let's first pay off our current loan", etc. After all, the Bible also emphasizes that good has this effect in that "good produces good" (which is also explained to us using the example of fruit by the Bible in Matthew 7:17-19, Luke 6:43-45 and James 3:11-12, while by my research in #D1 from web page "wtc_pl.htm"). Unfortunately, we must also remember that when in the case of marriages, the husband and wife do NOT cooperate with each other "in partnership" for the happiness and for good of their family, e.g. by using voluntary "giving", but they parasitically treat each other as a kind of enemies or opponents that must be defeated in the life game "whose ego is bigger", then they can turn their married life into a kind of "vestibule of hell" - as this is illustrated in a short video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8DNgi5Tok4 that humorously presents the destructive tendency of women to "win" every game against their husbands. This is why it is worth putting special attention, knowledge and efforts NOT only into choosing the right person to be your husband or wife - as I explain it below in truth (#3) , but also to prepare oneself at a young age to play a "partner" role in marriage (and NOT the role of an enemy or adversary in the game of life).
In turn, the definition of "taking" based on the statements of the Bible can be formulated as follows. "Taking is a behaviour resulting from selfish love of oneself and being almost effortless, that is, it does NOT require one's own contribution of work, knowledge, agreement, compromise, etc., but depends on satisfying some need or momentary whim of one's body that on another neighbour (or a whole group of neighbours) is imposed by force, authority, payment, fraud, subterfuge, crime, etc. - and hence that in this neighbour (or neighbours) causes the feeling of being forced, while the implementation of which requires from this neighbour the overcoming of at least one of the internal resistances existing in this neighbour." Examples of "taking" are, for example, long-term employment for a lowest wage, visiting a prostitute, or protested by the recent "me too" movement (see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=me+too+movement ) of the seducing of e.g. one's secretary or e.g. a beautiful actress - in return for which, by the decision of the person doing the "taking" she will be offered, for example, a salary increase, or a role in a film. Fortunately, if both participants of the marriage really desire, then with the help of God and the knowledge taught by the Bible and Jesus, they can transform any evil, including "taking", through the joint effort of both of them into the good and everyday happiness of the entire family. However, the key to success here is partnership, or as someone wise put it nicely: "the only problem is that both of them want this at the same time" - that is, the efforts of only one of them will NOT be able to heal and make the marriage happy, unless God gets involved and miraculously helps him/her when hearing prayers.
In cases where both parties involved in the partnership practice these revolutionary principles commanded by Jesus and described in the Bible, the situation develops completely differently. For example, in a marriage both sides are to voluntarily try to "give" and NOT just "take". Although this will probably shock many, the satisfaction of "giving" is embedded in the software of soul (see web page "soul_proof.htm") in both women and men. Hence, with an appropriate moral attitude and submission to Jesus' idea of mutual "giving" (see the Bible, e.g. verse 5:21-33 from Ephesians), both of them will derive both bodily pleasure and spiritual happiness as well as life satisfaction and a sense of fulfilment from this voluntary "giving". The fact that voluntary giving is also highly satisfying for women is confirmed by the words of a woman from the so-called Feminine Latina Schools of Modern Woman (see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=shorts+Feminine+Latina+Schools+Modern+Woman ) documented, for example, in a short free video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLEESVu77gA , where the woman and mother of sons shown in it states - I am quoting: "as a woman I believe there's nothing more satisfying than giving pleasure to your men". The same principle is illustrated by the monument called "Unconditional Surrender" from the USA (see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Unconditional+Surrender+statue+with+USS+Midway ) - an interesting story of which is widely described on the Internet after searching for it with English keywords: Unconditional Surrender . It is worth noting here that there is NO greater satisfaction also for a man than voluntarily "giving" pleasure to his woman.
"Giving" in accordance with Jesus' recommendations also brings many other benefits if it is practiced by both parties in a given relationship. For example, in the case of husbands and wives, "giving" instead of "taking" with the simultaneous presence of mutual communication which allows avoiding "giving" what the other party no longer wants, and replacing it with "giving" what the other party needs, allows for the replacement of today's marital struggle into a kind of series of eternal happiness for both parties. Moreover, "giving" allows the negotiation of changes and choosing what is best. At the same time, it allows to avoid guessing and attempts to "mind reading" that lead to incorrect actions.
Unfortunately, in addition to what is good for our lives, everything around us is also influenced by the so-called "powers of evil". These powers try hard to spoil everything that serves good - including our marriage and family life. So it is worth knowing what methods of spoiling these "powers of evil" most often use. And so, all the most important of them have been described in the Bible for about 2000 years - and in practice they remain valid until today. In the first place in the descriptions from the Bible there is "temptation" - that is, luring us into doing something that takes advantage of our weaknesses and ends up in a tragedy for our lives. For example, nowadays the most common object of temptation is "money" - that is, a way for the tempted person to get rich quickly and easily. Another object of temptation is "sex" - the source of often extramarital adventure. Another frequently used method of the "power of evil" also described in the Bible, but typically ignored by people of today, although nowadays even more often implemented than in ancient times, is the so-called demonic "possession" - see blog #363E or #M1 to #M5 from my web page named "evil.htm". The problem with such "possessions" is that priests detached from life forget that the "powers of evil" highly experienced in making frauds deliberately and skilfully changed the names used in the Bible during the approximately 2000 years that have passed since the Bible was written. Hence, these material beings, which nowadays intensify their hidden invasion and exploitation of the Earth and humanity that has been going on for thousands of years, in practice still carry out "possessions" until today. Only that while most often called "demons" in the Bible, they currently are known to people under completely different names - i.e. popularly and traditionally as "UFOnauts" or "aliens". At the same time, looking almost identically to people their agents on Earth are already working on renaming them into yet other names (after all, "with the more names one describes the same thing, the greater the confusion among people" - e.g. see the confusion caused by the forced by UFOnauts onto people the use of the name "totalism" - i.e. the one spelled with "s", instead of the name "totalitarianism", as if both of them had the same meaning, which cunningly imposed forcing I explained in item #A5 from the web page "totalizm_pl.htm"). Despite being ignored today, "possession" is the source of a significant proportion of temptations and marriage breakdowns. After all, during the 2000 years that have passed since the Bible was written, material beings carrying out "possessions" (i.e. UFOnauts - see blog #363E) have learned many new tricks which make today possessions much more difficult to detect and their effects more harmful to people. Women, in turn, are particularly susceptible to secretly becoming "possessed" - this is where the name "demon of narcissist" comes from (see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=demon+of+narcissist ), which nowadays is becoming a real plague that destroys marriages (for details see item #V2 on the web page "humanity.htm"), while for the defence against which it is necessary to develop a wise strategy. In addition to the above, the "powers of evil" also have dozens of other methods of turning life into a kind of "vestibule of hell" - all of which are demonstrated to us nowadays. Their examples include the devaluation of money and the increase in the cost of living, political and economic unrest, wars, cataclysms secretly caused by advanced UFO technology, poisoning of oceans, drinking water, soil and food, increase in crimes, reprogramming of people's morals with technical telepathy and hypnosis and changing their customs into new and impossible to control today, etc.
Marriage is one of our most important and longest-lasting commitments in life. For example, there is NO retirement from marriage - just like it is, for example, from our professional work, while God and tradition impose on us the obligation to ensure that it lasts for the rest of our lives. In many cultures and religions, it is placed third on the list of the most important life obligations (right after serving God and the obligation to care for aging parents). Of course, being one of the most important obligations, it requires preparation, study and expertise. Meanwhile, fewer and fewer young people believe that they need to prepare for married life. Once again, women are leading in disregarding this preparation. A large proportion of women believe that it is enough for them to be women. As a result, as the English say, this type of women: bring nothing to the table (see https://www.google.pl/search?q=what+woman+brings+to+the+table - i.e. "they do NOT bring anything to the family table" - notice that this symbolic "table" is NOT only a table for food or decisions about the wise distribution of earnings, but also advice for husband, wife and children, ideas and discussions on how to solve family problems, mutual communication, agreeing on compromises in case of differences of opinion, common and harmonious implementation in family life of the 10 commandments of God and the revolutionary ideas of Jesus - e.g. the "giving" discussed here instead of "taking", etc., etc.) In fact, nowadays rarely any youth is somehow prepared by their parents for a future marriage - just as in ancient times, generations of parents traditionally did it for millennia. Meanwhile, the fact that today we already have mobile phones and computers does NOT mean that the essence of life's realities and requirements is different than before. As many people today discover with shock, having a "mobile phone" or a "computer" does NOT change neither the requirements and actions of God, nor biology, nor nature, nor the life needs of man. We still have to treat God, our neighbours and nature with love and care, earn a living, eat, start a family, have children, properly raise our descendants, take care of aging parents, bury the dead and prepare for our old age. This means that the knowledge and life truths that humanity has accumulated over thousands of years of existence cannot be ignored without suffering painful consequences.
Here are some examples of very important truths in life which are related to marriage through the previously mentioned "cause and effect chains", and which truths I am describing below in numbered items from (#1) to (#7) because it is worth knowing them at the very beginning of life - that is, when the readers are still single and previously unmarried:
Truth (#1) That for important reasons, explained in more detail, among others, in item #B2 of the web page "antichrist.htm" or in post #211E to the blogs of totalizm, God created all of us people as highly imperfect, and thus committing many sins. (Meanwhile, human laws and the entire life of nations, countries and humanity are still formulated as if people were perfect and did NOT commit any sins - for example, almost nothing still includes preventions and security measures against the effects and consequences of various human imperfections and sins - which fact becomes fatal e.g. if a highly imperfect egoist manages to slip into the leadership of a nation.) It is because of this, as my father used to say, we have an obligation and must be willing to learn all our lives, and even then we will die still "knowing that we know virtually nothing." Therefore, from the time of our youth, we should assume that throughout our marriage we will learn from each other, including learning how to "give" correctly. This requires us to get used to discussing and communicating with each other, to making decisions together at the family "conference table", to compromise and NOT imposing our will or views on the other party, to avoid the word NO, to remember that all people are equal and quantitatively significantly imperfect (although their imperfections usually reveal themselves in areas and features different from ours), that each person is endowed by God with some gifts that generate good - hence this good usually compensates for their imperfections, that both the wife and the husband have an equal contribution to the future and the good of the family and descendants, that e.g. "being raised without a father" actually causes the increase of significant distortions of character - which experienced people warned us about in old times, etc., etc.
Truth (#2) That everything that is material in our lives, starting from taking every step, through lifting a spoon with our hand, and even piloting a plane or driving a car, is actually done in software way by God, only that God always immediately reads from our mind what we are trying to do, and then equally immediately, but with morally measured physical resistance and effectiveness for a given situation, God does it as if with His own "hands". This immediate, i.e. simultaneous with us, action of the "hands of God" results from the fact that in another "virtual world", in which lives God's Program (i.e. the so-called Holy Spirit), neither "time" nor the "elapse of time" exist - for details, see e.g. blogs #345E, #346E and #354E, or descriptions on my web page named "1985_theory_of_everything.htm" from which these three blogs are adapted. Detailed engineering descriptions of "how" really in the "world of matter" are carried out by the "hands of God" all activities and actions of people and all other living creatures (including even the actions of God's enemies) are provided in post #299E to the blogs of totalizm and in #J5 to #J5g from the web page called "petone.htm".
Truth (#3) That choosing a husband or wife is the most important decision of your entire life. Meanwhile, today's world is full of ill-educated youth who are more and more often described with the English expression "damaged goods" - see https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=damaged+goods+women . For examples of the views of such young people, watch, for example, short (i.e. running less than 6 minutes) free English-language videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQTr5YVNV2Q , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0w-t-p_XcVI , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHmsuYq-CLE , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nmJ0ssGycc , or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXyxqjyp8WM . (It is worth knowing that if the enemies of God and humanity that secretly manage the Internet, i.e. UFOnauts, detect from the address which launches a video that the command to run it comes from my web page or from my blog, then they with their "sabotage loop" (see blog #359E) may cause the video to NOT run. So if such startup problems occur, it is better to copy the address of the video to the search engine from your computer, and then run it as if you had searched yourself for it.) This is why nowadays is increasingly needed the knowledge, experience, teachings and help of both God and parents as well as the entire family and friends who support us in order to avoid the life mistake of taking such "damaged goods" as a wife or husband, while choosing to accompany us for the rest of our lives someone who, following the Bible together with us, will learn, build and help maintain family happiness and defend the whole family against all evil. This is why we need to choose someone who is the best candidate to learn with us how to be the best combination of husband and wife that fulfils the revolutionary ideas of Jesus.
Truth (#4) That God always first offers to everyone a life partner who, with God's supernatural omniscience, is best suited to his/her characteristics and the future life fate pre-planned by God. This is why first love is the most important, and the first husband or wife turns out to be the best. This is also why the best candidate for a husband or wife is often met as a teenager, and the happiest and most durable marriages in English are described as highschool sweetheart and her heart-throb (see https://www.google.pl/search?q=highschool+sweetheart+and+her+heart-throb ) - i.e. as objects of first love from high school. If, in turn, anyone of a given couple chosen by God as objects of mutual love, either due to their own fault, or due to the plots of the "power of evil" ruling over humanity (as e.g. this happens with the sacred Baobab tree from Fig. #V1ab below) causes the break up of this couple or prevents them from getting to know each other and developing love, then God selects further candidates for each of them, guided by the wise so-called the moral "law of the partnership ladder" described in more detail in #6C from subsection I4.1.1 of volume 5 of monograph [1/5] disseminated for free from web page "text_1_5.htm". This moral law states that: "if we had already but changed partners, our next partner will be more moral than the previous one - if in the previous partnership we were more moral than our partner (and therefore less guilty of the breakup), or he/she will be less moral than previous partner - if in our last partnership we were less moral than our partner (i.e. we were more guilty of the breakup)". In other words, the one who is responsible for the breakdown of the partnership offered to us by God ends up in a much worse situation than he/she was in that broken partnership. In turn, the one who was innocent of this breakdown, because he/she actively tried to prevent it, though unilaterally or unsuccessfully, ends up in a much better situation.
(This entire post #365E would NOT fit into the memory of this blog - hence the rest of it will be continued below as post #365_2E)