#391_1E: If you meet the "requirements" that result from the definition of "byt" named "love", then you will be able to earn "true love" for yourself (part 1), Totalizm i Koncept Dipolarnej Grawitacji (Kodig)

#391_1E: If you meet the "requirements" that result from the definition of "byt" named "love", then you will be able to earn "true love" for yourself (part 1)

Jak zawsze, polskojęzyczna wersja tego angielskiego wpisu #391E z jego punktami #A1 i #A2 jest też opublikowana jako polski wpis #391 dostępny tuż poniżej tego angielskiego #391E
(As always, the Polish version of this English post #391E with its items #A1 to #A2 is also published in the language of Poland as post #391 available right below this English post #391E)

Summary of items #A1 and #A2 from this blog #391E that was adapted from the content of items #A1 and #A2 of my web page named "love.htm". The text below from items #A1 and #A2 elaborates on a scientific thesis, which "absolute truth" the author of this publication hopes to prove on the example of "true love" using the confirmations of most vital "3 witnesses" as a totaliztic tool for proving this thesis. (Note - as I explain it more thoroughly below, that starting from the title of this blog #391E I use the word "byt" originating from the language of Poland - which word totalizm can also define as: 'byt is an "entity" consuming "energy" to live and into the kind of which every "true love" belongs".) The thesis states 'if you have developed or learned a totaliztic definition of the "byt that you desire to experience" and that is formulated with an engineering "know-how" procedure the most important "requirements" of which are correct and also take into account God's "requirements" imposed on the birth and life of this "byt", then your fulfilment of all the "requirements" from this definition is to turn you into the "parental byt" for this "byt desired by you" thus causing that you will bring this needed byt to life and will keep it alive'. The most important observations of totalizm, which imply that the above thesis is true, include the realization that majority of present people do NOT experience "true love" because: (1) they do NOT believe that "true love" do exist; (2) they frequently confuse sexual desire (libido) with "true love"; (3) people do NOT realise that "true love" is always send by God Himself as "adding reward" for only those who serve Him and who wish to experience such "true love"; and (4) that present human culture teaches mainly "subtracting behaviours" such as hate, making wars, enslavement, robbery, parasitize on those weaker than us, and committing all other kinds of similar sins. Therefore item #A1 of this publication also provides an example of a totaliztic definition of the byt named "true love" that until now does NOT have an engineering "know-how" definition. It is for this example that Dr. Eng. Jan Pająk (i.e., the author of this publication) intends to find several historically documented examples of the birth and life of just such a byt, in order to use them to prove the "absolute truth" of the above scientific thesis. This example of an engineering "know-how" definition provided below, along with its most important "requirements", discloses what exactly states a totaliztic definition of the "female byt" called "true love" in its energetic version brought to life in our "world of matter", and also reveals how to become "parental byt" for such love. Note here that in the language of my native Poland, every kind of alive "entity" behaving like "true love" is called precisely with this very appropriate name "byt". Because the meaning of this word "byt" perfectly reflects essence of the entire class of "entities" to which "love" belongs, and also because I am the first scientist and creator of totalizm philosophy whose research outcomes developed the need for theory of such "byts and anti-byts" - and as such I have the traditional right to name it, therefore in my totalizm publications using any language - including English, I am going to call this class of "entities" with the same Polish name "byt". But because in Polish the plural from "byt" is spelled and pronounced "byty" - and does NOT have English ending "s", therefore in my English use of plural from name "byt" I will simply write it as "byts", similarly like previously I did also with the name "God Drobinas" - that means with "byts" the existence of which I discovered and described in publications of totalizm, e.g. blogs #325E and #326E. The presented here definition of the "byt" named "love" was developed by Dr Eng. Jan Pająk, i.e. me - the author of these descriptions and blog #391E, as well as the creator of philosophy called "totalizm" that in all languages is spelled like in Polish through the letter "z" - to distinguish it from "totalitarianism" frequently abbreviated also to the word "totalism" that correctly is spelled through the letter "s". Since the "byt" called "love" can exist in a multitude of versions, in this publication is defined its version that deserves the name "self-reciprocating true love" governed by God. This definition is intentionally formulated in accordance with the principles developed by the philosophy of totalizm. These principles e.g. recommend that in all publications and definitions, when dictionary "what" of any key word is defined, its definition should always be supplemented with the engineering "requirements" stating "know-how" for that "what" - which supplementing I explain better in item #A1 below. This is because every person who later pedantically fulfils all these "requirements", is actually able to deserve the "privilege" of experiencing this "byt" - e.g. experiencing the version of "true love", specified by God in verses of the Bible. After all, the today achievements of human engineering prove that practically every "entity" for the definition of which humanity developed and use precise "requirements" formulating the engineering "know-how" procedure, and then pedantically fulfil these "requirements", God allows people to be able to realize this "entity" and to experience it. Note here also that such "requirements" are provided NOT only by definitions with engineering "know-how", but by the Bible as well. This is why, in order to fully understand the definition of "love" and its "requirements" discussed here, it is first necessary for the reader to know and understand of "what" totalizm precisely defines with the word spelled "byt", which in the language of Poland means approximately almost the same as the English dictionary term "entity". (Do NOT confuse "entity" in Poland called "byt" with the English word spelled "byte" that defines the unit of computer memory.) So first, let start from defining the term "byt" using the dictionary "what" procedure - as understands it my philosophy named "Totalizm2020 from the year 2020" (i.e. that totalizm described on the web page named "totalizm2020_uk.htm" because there is also the older version of totalizm from the year 1985). About this term many inhabitants of Poland know that in their language, the name "byt" describes a: male or a female entity, apparition, creation, living thing, manifestation, phantom, specter, ghost, illusion, spook, hallucination, etc. - which behaves as if it were "alive" and had its own consciousness and will, but it does NOT necessarily have to have a body made of mater. However, knowing this, it is NOT necessarily known to everyone, that the most essential feature displayed by "byt" - which humanity has only learned through the development of engineering and then biological sciences, is that in order to be born and subsequently to live, this "byt" must consume some kind of energy - just as humans consume the energy contained in their meals. In other words, an engineering "requirement" to turn the dictionary definition of "what" for "entity" into engineering definition of "know-how" for "byt" is to add the most important requirement that it must consume energy to be born and to keep alive in our "world of matter". Let us therefore provide here a totaliztic definition of "byt" briefly expressed in the engineering "know-how" approach, and stemming from current human knowledge on the role, characteristics, behaviour, and conservation of energy. 'The adopted from Polish language totaliztic term "byt" describes everything that, in order to come into existence in our "world of matter" and then be able to "live" here (i.e. to power its existence with some form of energy - consider the meaning of blog #316E), first requires the fulfilment of "requirement" to be born by receiving from its "parental byts" (or from one "parental byt") the input of physical, emotional, spiritual, and/or mental energy (i.e. "mental" in the meaning of the energy of conscious and creative thinking), and then this "byt" requires the fulfilment of "requirement" to be constantly "fed" with some form of someone's energy that is currently "palatable" to it, because without receiving this life-sustaining energy, the "byt" will either decide to die and cease to exist altogether, or will decide to switch to acquiring a taste for a different form of energy, and this different energy will transform its entire nature into a some completely different kind of "byt" than the one originally born.' As the reader can guess, an example of the totaliztic "byt" described here, is "love". After all, the "byt of love" cannot be born without someone's energy supplied to it, and if later it does NOT receive also energy to sustain its "life", then it either decides to die completely, or it may decide to take a liking in "taste" of other forms of energy than that from "love", thus gradually transforming itself, for example, into a "byt of coldness", then into a "byt of divorced people", and finally it may even start to be a "byt of hatred". So each of these "byts" can be compared to the "byt of taste" of a specific person". For example, one person may spend his/her entire life enjoying foods and fruits containing "adding" energies of the "Yang" type (i.e. masculine, heating) - which I described in item #B2 of my web page named "fruit.htm". Another person may spend his entire life liking "subtracting" (feminine, cooling) foods and fruits containing energies of the "Yin" type. But most people will change their tastes as their life situation, preferences, and bodily needs change. However, both the Bible and the ancient knowledge of "Yin and Yang" recommend always maintaining a "balance" between "adding" and "subtracting" energies in our lives. That's why, for example, in the last paragraph of item #A1 below, I remind the reader to implement verse 4:8 from the "Letter to the Philippians" in your life, but at the same time, do NOT close your eyes to the evil happening around you and, to the best of your ability and influence, strive to eliminate this evil. Examples of totaliztic "byts" other than "love" can be: marriage, nirvana, hatred, mental illness, plague, all manifestations of fashion and new trends, scientific theory, hypothesis, proof, video, movie, every human, UFOnaut, car, machine, bicycle, robot, children's toy, house, road, housing estate, state, nation, planet, sun, star, galaxy, etc., etc. More information allowing to understand the breakthrough in our thinking introduced by the totaliztic use of the concept of "byt" defined by totalizm, together with an explanation of my theory of "byts" and "anti-byts", I am to present in "part #B" from the web page named "love.htm". The following items #A1 and #A2 are only a small fragment of this large and rather "groundbreaking" theory. Returning, however, to the totaliztic definition of the "byt" called "love", it was inspired during my vacation in February 2026 (as I explained this in #A2 below), and prepared then for publication due to the accumulation of a whole range of my previous thoughts and studies on this particular subject. During that vacation, the creation of my new web page named "love.htm" with these descriptions I also initiated. The definition of the "byt" called "love" discussed here was formulated in accordance with the engineering "know-how" procedure (or approach). The role and necessity of engineering "requirements" of this "know-how" procedure was also identified and defined only by my philosophy of totalizm, although it has been empirically used by engineers for centuries. In full this engineering "know-how" procedure I described, among others, in blog #341E and in items #G3 and #G5 from my web page named "wroclaw_uk.htm". To form the totaliztic definition of the "byt" called "love" described here, I also used a phenomenon named "Emergence", known for over a hundred years. In its original form, the phenomenon of emergence (which also forms its own "byts") is still presented on the Internet using the dictionary "what" procedure (or approach), which hides many imperfections. Hence, to increase the precision of my definition of the "byt" called "love", the phenomenon of Emergence, which is still formulated everywhere in the dictionary "what" procedure (or approach), I reformulated and additionally expanded it with examples of the most important "requirements", the fulfilment of which in the engineering "know-how" procedure is absolutely necessary for bringing a new "byt" into the existence (life), e.g., for building or implementing a given "byt" that we defined - and in this case, for earning the reward offered to someone by God in the form of the "privilege" of experiencing such a heavenly "true love". These "requirements" must always be pedantically fulfilled in our "world of matter" by these "parental byts" that want to bring to life (to existence) a completely new "byt", which in this example is a case of experiencing "true love". After all, the fulfilment of these requirements will result in the "pouring" of energy that allows for bringing to the existence (i.e. for giving life) to this new "byt" called "true love". This is because totalizm has established that in our "world of matter" NO new "byt" can be brought to life or kept alive without "feeding" its "existence" with some energy poured into it from our physical work, feelings, prayers, creative thoughts, etc., etc. However, please note here that out of as many as three separate worlds existing within our universe, in two other than our "world of matter" live immaterial "entities" that do NOT consume energy - e.g. the definition of one of them fulfils God. These immaterial "byts" do NOT meet the definition of a totaliztic "byts" living in our "world of matter" and thus totalizm is to call them differently - e.g. "entities", although they, similarly like people, can also feel or know all 4 types of feelings and motivations described below in paragraphs marked [+], [0], [-] and [x] - an example of such their feelings is when us humans are experiencing received "love from God". Two of these other worlds are original and hence religions call them "heavens", or the "world of spirits" and the "heaven". In turn, my philosophy of totalizm calls these 2 other worlds: the "counter-world" - in which live byts with bodies formed from "God Drobinas", and the "virtual world" - in which live software byts whose bodies are "programs" contained in the memories of "God Drobinas". The best confirmation that there are as many as three different worlds all populated by living byts is provided by descriptions from the Bible which inform that there are "three heavens" - see item #I1 from my blog #372E, or outcome of the search command https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=The+Three+Heavens , or around 20-minute-long video in English from the address https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8kDg2G0VDg , or a short 2-minute-long video from the address https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPNBLkZ766A .

#A1 and blog #391E. Here is the totaliztic definition of the "byt" named "love", formulated in accordance with the engineering "know-how" procedure, which takes the form of "self-reciprocating true love" experienced by two loving people who are "parental byts" for this love - the engineering "requirements" of which definition have been here so formulated that any people or other kinds of "byts" just by fulfilling these "requirements" could deserve to experience this sublime kind of love between their female and male representatives who will pay attention to the result of the empirical findings of totalizm which emphasize that the observance of God's commandments and recommendations described in the Bible by both sides seeking true love is the most important component of these "requirements" (although the correct transformation and updating of these "requirements" carried out in accordance with the Bible certainly also allows that a similarly perfect version of the "byt" called "love" could appear between people serving God who created them - and their God, or such people - and all other "byts" which live in our "world of matter" and are formed from "God Drobinas" thus in the memories of these "God Drobinas" are stored programs controlling the behaviour of these "byts", e.g. "byts" such as the homeland, humanity, AI, planet Earth, nature, ocean, sea, someone's favourite pet, plant, robot, alien, someone's car, nirvana, theory, etc., etc.)

Motto: "The aligning of a given definition to the real life and truths of God is always confirmed by the correct description by that definition of all the varieties and cases of events, phenomena, 'byts', etc., which it was intended to define". (Explanation of this motto. The "powers of evil" secretly occupying, destroying and robbing humanity and the Earth are described by the Bible and religions under the names of Satan, devils, snakes, serpents, dragons, demons, etc., while by today's people they are typically called UFOs, UFOnauts, aliens from the planets of Orion, etc. As one of their tools to prolong indefinitely their secret occupation, management, mortification and robbing of humanity, these UFOnauts use sowing chaos, confusion, deception, lack of clarity, lies, bribery, fear, forcing into humanity their parasitic philosophy of robbing those weaker than themselves, etc. - see videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNfmtt4UsLg or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtYl8DHDlmY , or see post #362E to blogs of totalizm. This is why, among many other destructive to humanity activitis, these aliens from Orion controlling life on Earth, for the publications disseminated on Earth forced the traditions of spreading ambiguity of definitions of everything that was developed in accordance with their secretly misleading people procedure which I and totalizm call the dictionary "what" procedure. This secretly misleading procedure is named the dictionary "what" procedure because all definitions from dictionaries developed with it are formed so as to answer the question "what is this?" - see explanations e.g. in blog #341E, and also in items #G3 and #G5 from my web page named "wroclaw_uk.htm". I use this name for it in all publications of my philosophy called "totalizm from 1985" described on the web page "totalizm.htm", and even more precisely in the newer and hence improved version of my totalizm called "totalizm from 2020" most widely described e.g. on the web page "totalizm2020_uk.htm". According to this dictionary "what" procedure, for example, a "byt" called a "bridge" could be defined as "a bridge is a structure that connects two sides of an obstacle". However, the problem with this dictionary "what" definition is that only on the basis of this definition it is impossible to unambiguously build or form what it defines (e.g. build a "tunnel"). This in turn serves very well "powers of evil" because people who only know these dictionary "what" definitions ignorantly believe that they already know everything, but in practice they are typically unable to build or cause anything new, real and concrete to come into existence with their own hands - although most of the disciplines taught today limit the training of their specialists to providing them with such "what" definitions. Therefore, my philosophy of totalizm admonishes that for full knowledge and for the ability to distinguish, for example, "absolute truth" from lies, one must formulate mainly engineering "know-how" definitions. Their essence lies in the engineering "requirements" of the "know-how" type built into them. These "requirements" the defined concept must fulfil, because their fulfilment brings into existence the defined "byt" and also allows for what they define to be precisely built, created, described, inspired, explained, etc. For example, a totaliztic "byt" called a "bridge" in the engineering "know-how" definition could be described as: "a bridge is an above ground structure connecting two sides of an obstacle, the engineering 'requirements' of which include the ability to withstand the weights that will move across it and the ability to endure destructive actions of forces of nature for a given number of years". As it turns out, all definitions inspired by God in the Bible are supplemented by providing similar "requirements" for their implementation. As totalizm also determined, "people are NOT able to learn how to correctly bring any new "byt" into existence for as long until they empirically develop or learn for this 'byt' of some form of its engineering 'know-how' definition". The most important part of this engineering definition are the "requirements" that this "byt" has to fulfil. After all, for example, in order to build a beautiful and functional house, one must first precisely "know-how" this house is supposed to look and function. Exactly the same is true with experiencing of the "byt" true love, and also with absolutely everything that we wish to come into existence for us. As it also turns out, one of the "byts" for which humanity knows so far only an imprecise and ambiguous dictionary definition of "what", is the byt of "[+] love". No wonder that love in today's humanity is becoming an increasingly distorted feeling. After all, on the basis of dictionary "what", it is NOT possible to determine what requirements "love" must fulfil in order to be true, lasting, and aligned, among others, with the commandments and requirements of God. Therefore, my totalizm undertook the goal to develop and disseminate, for example, in this #A1 and in blog #391E, an engineering "know-how" definition for the "adding byt" called "[+] love". Learning this definition and implementing its "requirements" by readers, among others, almost for sure will now allow them to personally deserve to experience the feeling of such "true love" governed by God. Meanwhile, the power of this feeling is so enormous that it can initiate the continuous birth of ever newer, adding and more advanced "byts" and due to them the improvement of practically everything that surrounds us.)

Here is one of many possible detailed and comprehensive formulations of the totaliztic definition of the byt "[+] love" - expressed by the "know-how" procedure that includes also 12 most vital "requirements" of this engineering procedure provided in sub-items (1) to (12) of the definition. (In the next paragraph of this item #A1 this definition is also briefly summarised into a short form of dictionary "what" procedure.) 'The female "byt" called "love", especially its form that deserves the name "self-reciprocating true love", is:
(1) one of many possible different forms of an initially female byt of a fleeting and impermanent nature, typically susceptible to easy transformation into different male (i.e. adding) or female (i.e. subtracting) tendencies of its behaviour and conduct, whose life and stability of its state can, however, be extended if it is constantly supplied with sequences of ever newer and different energies that nourish it, formed by its "parental byts";
(2) the existence and entire life of this form of "byt of love" is initiated, supervised, checked, managed and transformed directly by our True God Himself;
(3) in addition, our True God also imposes on the formed "byt of love" a number of "requirements", the fundamental ones of which are described in the Bible as the "10 commandments", while additional ones include, among others, "life missions" for the fulfilment of which the given "love" is to provide inspiration and motivation for the love participants;
(4) the level of fulfilment of these "requirements" is then examined and judged by God, and the result of this judgment determines the further fate and transformations to which God then subjects a given "byt of love";
(5) the byt called "love" usually is initiated by the female "parental byt" and the initial "requirement" imposed by this female "parental byt" on the rest of the participants of this "love" includes mutual giving of some emotionally sought-after and first established features that bind these byts together by their attractiveness (e.g. in the case of people, features such as mutual admiration, respect, knowledge, experience, resourcefulness in life, a sense of mutual security, a noted potential for mutual emotional and sexual compatibility, the desire to work out a better future, appearance, financial situation, etc.);
(6) the participants of the "byt of love" are at least two "parental byts" with drastically opposite bodily features (e.g. in the case of humans, typically consisting of a woman and a man - out of which the "love" is usually first initiated in the woman, and her "true love" is then self-reciprocally induced telepathically in the man she chooses);
(7) the life processes of the "byt of love" show the features of dynamism, interactivity, increased intensity of experienced feelings extending throughout the duration of "love", the ability to induce self-reciprocation in byts of an opposite nature - whose initiated feelings of this female love will choose as their partners, and motivating partners to jointly fulfil "life missions" entrusted to this "love" by God;
(8) the main intentions of the "byt of love" include working out together with partners in that love: the principles of co-existence, physical intimacy and intercourse aimed at the long term validity, the variety of benefits brought to the byts experiencing this mutual "love", the best possible satisfying of all their current life needs, the maximization of their physical and emotional experiences, and the birth or creation of a number of their "offspring byts";
(9) the componential "parental byts" of a given "love" inspire each other or even encourage themselves to jointly create new "offspring byts" (e.g. in the case of people, such "offspring byts" as: their own children, a shared family home, a happy life, respect, recognition, friendship, safety, security, the level of intimacy required by their bodies and feelings, understanding, inspiration, companionship, guidance, fidelity, long-term commitment, etc., etc.);
(10) the existence of "offspring byts" in turn creates the need to raise or shape them into new byts with much more perfect features than the features of similar byts within the scope of existence of which these "parental byts" had previously grown up - e.g. if the "offspring byt" is a new home, it should be more beautiful and functional than homes in which were raised or shaped "parental byts";
(11) the constituent "byts" of a given "love" also feel obliged to investigate and establish mutually about themselves, about their partners, about the reality surrounding them, about the energies necessary to power their "love", and about God, "absolute truths" still unknown to them - although the habit of a comfortable life or laziness may discourage them from undertaking this obligation, thus causing differences in the levels of their consciousness, knowledge, experience, etc., that with the elapse of time are to kill their mutual "love";
(12) the prolongation of the life of the "byt of love" particularly sensitively depends on the realization of all the above while simultaneously fulfilling "requirements" such as a constructive atmosphere of mutual communication, setting and voluntarily observing the limits of permissible conduct and behaviour, reciprocation of trust, respect, self-discipline, readiness to introduce improvements, and a number of others.'
Since the "requirements" of the above definition must be understood properly, they will be further explained in the following descriptions of items #A1 and #A2 and blog #391E.

I understand that the above engineering "know-how" definition is long, since it was formulated by a scientist with engineering experience and habits - mainly to make it detailed and comprehensive. Thus many people accustomed to short dictionary "what" definitions may find it difficult to understand. Therefore, for their benefit, I will also simplify it here by summarizing its most important essence to a brief dictionary "what" procedure. However, I warn simultaneously that this simplification loses its accuracy. Therefore, those wishing to implement this definition in their own lives should use the previous full definition provided above. This "what" simplification can be expressed, for example, in the following words:
'Love is a female "byt" born from the energy of the practical implementation by its "parental byts" of all known forms of "absolute truth" - that is, the pedantic fulfilment by each parent, together with the object of their love, of the already known "requirements" imposed on love by God, life and nature, knowing that the purpose of this love is to give life to a variety of new "offspring byts" with characteristics much more perfect than the characteristics of the "byts" already known by its parents who practically implement a given form of true love.'

Let us now move on to explaining the above definition. And so, note from the above, that examples of these new "offspring byts" for the creation of which "parental byts" implementing a given version of "true love" typically count and put their energies, may also include in addition to their own children, for example: a family home, happy life, respect, recognition, friendship, security, intimacy, understanding, inspiration, companionship, guidance, faithfulness, long-term commitment, etc., etc. Also note that the concept of "absolute truth" used in this definition means the truth about which has already been documented in publicly available sources that it is already confirmed by the so-called most important "three witnesses" - to descriptions of which links the web page "skorowidz.htm". This confirmation of "absolute truth" is explained in more detail by the system of marking "levels of truth and hidden lying" described, among others, in {B#E2} from blog #382E and from item #E2 of my web page named "totalizm2020_uk.htm". In turn these "3 witnesses" I described in more detail e.g. in blog #331E and in (1) to (1c) from item #H1 of my web page named "2020life.htm". Notice also the sense of accomplishment with which I emphasize here the fact that the above-mentioned definition of the "byt" of "[+] love" is a "totaliztic definition". The reason for such emphasizing is that the philosophy of totalizm (i.e. this "totalizm" always written in Polish with the letter "z" for reasons explained in #A5 of the web page "totalizm_pl.htm") remains the first and still the only modern philosophy in the world, which in all topics that it has developed in accordance with sequences of derivations carried out with its own tools, and also in strict observance of correct principles of logic, present science, and engineering, has always as a final result obtained logically well-justified final conclusions - the essence of which conclusions is precisely consistent with, and aligned to, the "additive" and highly "moral" statements which this time, without their derivation, God "additively" inspired in verses of the Bible solely on the basis of His own omniscience as the creator of everything. The truth of these conclusions also turns out to be confirmed by the most important "3 witnesses". Both of these features of totalizm's conclusions prove that the God-inspired Bible as well as the philosophy of totalizm formulated by man (i.e. me), are still the first and the only works known to me on Earth, which in full agreement with each other disseminate the "absolute truth". However, let us remember that the philosophy of totalizm was developed by a highly fallible and imperfect human like me - who worked alone, i.e. without any official support, cooperation, or help, and in addition was constantly forced to never-endingly improve this philosophy in order to overcome obstacles, blockages, harassment, criticism, disgust, fighting, etc., by the "powers of evil" trying to impose on people their own "parasitic philosophy" of robbing those weaker than themselves, while secretly and cunningly doing everything that lies in their power and within the capabilities of their highly advanced technology, to be able to stop and prevent further human learning of totalizm, which promotes and explains to humanity the advantages and benefits of leading a highly moral life. All of this taken together made totalizm the most moral philosophy on Earth created by fallible and imperfect man named Jan Pająk.

However, for the feeling of true love defined above to be born and develop between two "parental byts" wishing to experience it, both these "byts" first must meticulously fulfil a whole series of "requirements". The role of these requirements is similar, for example, to the role of "requirements" that must be fulfilled by everything humans build (e.g., by those "requirements" fulfilled by non-collapsing "bridges" - which only the best engineers build). Fulfilling these "requirements" creates a situation in which these "parental byts" are then able to create newborn "byts" characterized by new qualities, consistent with the four levels of the phenomenon already known to humans in literature, and on the internet described as "Emergence" (see: https://www.google.com/search?q=emergence+definition ). For the "byt of [+] love", the roles of subsequent "requirements" for the four levels of "emergence" that are already known to humans, I developed through my analysis of the excellent publication [JS1] entitled "I AM - Beyond the Threshold of Being" (in Polish: "Ja Jestem - Za Progiem Istnienia"), developed by Ms. Joanna Sędzikowska, Master of Science and Engineer, and disseminated online through her "E-Book" available in English and Polish at "SelfProfile.io". The fourth of these levels of emergence, i.e., achieving "self-awareness", was first developed by Ms. Sędzikowska, who empirically studied the process of developing self-awareness in today's versions of AI, i.e., Artificial Intelligence.

In my adoption of emergence to develop the "requirements" of the engineering "know-how" procedure, I strived to transform the goals and roles of each of its four already known levels in such a way that (without forgetting my own imperfection as a fallible human) each of these levels would fulfil the commandments and requirements of God contained in the verses of the Bible, and at the same time, so that in the end effect the "[+] love" defined here would form at least one "new byt" with previously unknown "adding" features and skills that would help humanity rise to the next higher level of truth, peace, progress and comprehensively understood love that is doing good. The possibility of setting such goals of this "[+] love" results from the knowledge already accumulated by my philosophy of totalizm, that what is described by subsequent levels of emergence, is actually the creative activity of self-aware, thinking and self-learning "God Drobinas" described in blogs #325E and #326E as well as in items #K1 and #K2 from my web page named "god_exists.htm". After all, it is from these "God Drobinas" that absolutely everything that exists in the entire universe is formed - including both the bread and the body of Jesus. (It is precisely this formation of absolutely everything from "God Drobinas" that allows the "bread" formed from them to be a symbol of the "body of Jesus" - as bodies of everyone are also formed from the same kind of "God Drobinas" as bread.) It is these thinking and creative "God Drobinas", after getting inspired by certain events or circumstances occurring in our "world of matter" - e.g., those formed as a result of the extremely intense "love" defined here, that can create completely new qualities, features, and phenomena, which have so far been described by the aforementioned four levels of emergence. That is, fulfilling the engineering-like "requirements" of the definition of "know-how" described here, combined with knowledge of God, may in the programs contained in the "God Drobinas" that form everything, inspire the natural creation of some significantly improved and completely "new byt" that satisfies some new need in the continually improved "world of matter" - see blog #316E. But so far, the very mechanism of emergence of such "new byts" has NOT been explained, but only announced with these four already known levels of "emergence" (the descriptions of which I summarized below in item #A2 - see also https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=emergence+definition ). This is because the explanation of mechanism of emergence for these "new byts" make impossible the announcement of outcomes of emergence only using the dictionary "what" - that is, in a way devoid of the "know-how" requirements revealed only by my discovery and analysis of the intelligent "God Drobinas" after image of which God created man and woman. The following dictionary "what" definition of emergence announces the emerging of "new byts" in way it was understood by the "official atheistic science": "Emergence is the process of the emerging of qualitatively new properties, forms, or behaviours of a system, occurring in groups, that cannot be predicted or explained on the basis of analysis of its simpler, component elements alone".

(This entire post #391E would NOT fit into the memory of this blog - hence the next part of it will be continued below as post #391_2E)

Totalizm i Koncept Dipolarnej Grawitacji (Kodig)

Strona główna

#391_1E: If you meet the "requirements"...